I don't exactly understand what do you mean with "it doesn't look correct when rendered"? Does it look squeezed horizontally? If so, everything is ok: you must keep in mind that a widescreen image has a pixel aspect ratio of 1.42, which is different from the pixel aspect ratio of your computer monitor or of any other 4/3 screen. This is why everything looks thinner. You only have two ways of seeing your widescreen image correctly: A) using a 16/9 screen (like a plasma monitor i.e.) with 720x576 1.777 aspect ratio 1.420 pixel aspect ratio images. Or:
using a 4/3 screen (a normal TV screen) with 720x405 1.777 aspect ratio 1 pixel aspect ratio rendered frames. The final output in this case will show two black horizontal bands on the top and bottom of your screen, in order to fit inside the 720x576 PAL standard. Emmanuel's suggestion of rendering at 1024x576 1.777 aspect ratio and 1 pixel aspect ratio is similar than my
solution: it only requires more disk space and an easy scaling operation in post. But it could help retaining crisper details... I hope I correctly understood the problem.
Stefano Oggeri
Technical director
3search design.
t +39.011.5637744
f +39.011.5618341
www.3search.it
Via XX settembre 10, Torino
ITALY